Vaccination Education sign now

I know some of you don’t want to hear a bad word said about Vaccines…if that’s the case… turn away now. But…if you’re a parent or a practitioner…perhaps you may put aside your dislike of the subject and become better informed. This Vaccination Education program is provide to both the public, parents and practitioners with vital new information to ensure the safety of vaccines given to children are reviewed and updated. Crying child being vaccinated...

1…It is imperative that every parent (and practitioner) know the risk of vaccinating their child.

2…There is no place for pro/anti vaccine divides, when it comes to allegations of corporate fraud related to vaccines.

3…If you’re concerned with the the ethics of mandatory vaccination of children, I encourage you to do your research…go beyond the mainstream propaganda…a child’s life could depend on it.

Between ‘Herd Mentality’ and current government regulations [requiring ALL children entering (public) school to be vaccinated] there has been one very important step left out…testing each child for genetic predispositions the may cause adverse reactions to vaccines. It’s a numbers game…the government and Drug Companies know a certain number of children will be adversely affected by vaccines…but the cost to prevent these adverse reactions is prohibitive.

Case: Hannah Poling. When she was 19 months old, Hannah, the daughter of Jon and Terry Poling, received five vaccines — diphtheria–tetanus–acellular pertussis, Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib), measles–mumps–rubella (MMR), varicella, and inactivated polio. At the time, Hannah was interactive, playful, and communicative. Two days later, she was lethargic, irritable, and febrile. Ten days after vaccination, she developed a rash consistent with vaccine-induced varicella.

Months later, with delays in neurologic and psychological development, Hannah was diagnosed with encephalopathy caused by a mitochondrial enzyme deficit. Hannah’s signs included problems with language, communication, and behavior — all features of autism spectrum disorder. Although it is not unusual for children with mitochondrial enzyme deficiencies to develop neurologic signs between their first and second years of life, Hannah’s parents believed that vaccines had triggered her encephalopathy.They sued the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) for compensation under the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) and won.

On March 6, 2008, the Polings took their case to the public. Standing before a bank of microphones from several major news organizations, Jon Poling said that “the results in this case may well signify a landmark decision with children developing autism following vaccinations. For years, federal health agencies and professional organizations had reassured the public that vaccines didn’t cause autism. Now, with DHHS making this concession in a federal claims court, the government appeared to be saying exactly the opposite. Caught in the middle, clinicians were at a loss to explain the reasoning behind the VICP’s decision.

The Poling case is best understood in the context of the decision-making process of this unusual vaccine court. In the late 1970s and early 1980s, American lawyers successfully sued pharmaceutical companies claiming that vaccines caused a variety of illnesses, including unexplained coma, sudden infant death syndrome, Reye’s syndrome, transverse myelitis, mental retardation, and epilepsy.

By 1986, all but one manufacturer of the diphtheria–tetanus–pertussis vaccine had left the market. The federal government stepped in, passing the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, which included the creation of the VICP. Funded by a federal excise tax on each dose of vaccine, the VICP compiled a list of compensable injuries. If scientific studies supported the notion that vaccines caused an adverse event — such as thrombocytopenia after receipt of measles-containing vaccine or paralysis after receipt of oral polio vaccine — children and their families were compensated quickly, generously, and fairly.

The number of lawsuits against vaccine makers decreased dramatically.

Now we return to current news… Considering the extent of the allegations here, it is really shocking that the conventional media has not picked up on this story. About the only major media source reporting on it was Forbes Magazine.

Two virologists have filed a federal lawsuit against Merck, their former employer, alleging the vaccine maker overstated the effectiveness of their mumps vaccine, which may have cost the US government hundreds of millions of dollars over the past decade. They claim they “witnessed firsthand the improper testing and data falsification in which Merck engaged to artificially inflate the vaccine’s efficacy findings”. Chatom Primary Care has also filed a federal antitrust class action lawsuit against Merck, alleging Merck went to great lengths to manipulate test procedures and falsifying results to prop up fraudulent efficacy claims, thereby maintaining its monopoly on the MMR vaccine

These two lawsuits couldn’t come at a more precarious time for Merck, as the Italian Health Ministry recently conceded the MMR vaccine caused autism in a now nine-year old boy—albeit this news has been effectively censored in the US. A recent review of the varicella (chickenpox) vaccination program in the U.S. concluded that the vaccine has not proven to be cost-effective; increased the incidence of shingles; failed to provide long-term protection from the disease it targets―chicken pox―and; is less effective than the natural immunity that existed in the general population before the vaccine. Vaccine efficacy was found to have declined well below 80 percent by of 2002.

‘SO…do you believe that parents should be allowed to request that the Government provide free pre-genetic testing to qualify [or disqualify] their child in relation to the administration of vaccines?’

In order to ensure a Safer Childhood Vaccination Program it is imperative that the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA) of 1986 be updated in order to provide free pre-genetic testing to qualify [or disqualify] a child in relation to the administration of mandatory vaccination.

Currently there is a lack of effort by the Government to provide new legislation and funding to test individually before immunization for known pre-genetic conditions that are recognized potential risk factors. It is clear from the Governments admission in the Hannah Poling case that the Government believes there was [in this case] a clear causation that related to both the genetic pre-dispositions and the vaccines. In order to have come to this medical assumption and legally declare it, the Government must recognize the pre-genetic risks to children.

Knowing this…parents should be allowed to request that the Government provide a free pre-genetic test to qualify [or disqualify] their child in relation to the administration of vaccines. This is the message that each parent should be sending [loud and clear] to the Government.

The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 was headed with the topic of vaccine safety that had become prominent during the mid 1970s with increases in lawsuits filed on behalf of those presumably injured by the diphtheria, pertussis, tetanus (DPT) vaccine. Legal decisions were made and damages awarded despite the lack of scientific evidence to support vaccine injury claims. As a result of these decisions, liability and prices soared, and several manufacturers halted production. A vaccine shortage resulted and public health officials became concerned about the return of epidemic disease.

To reduce liability and respond to public health concerns, Congress passed the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA) [http://www.nvic.org/injury-compensation/origihanlaw.aspx ] and the all important federal Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) [https://vaers.hhs.gov/esub/index] and the PDF [http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/downloads/appendices/appdx-full-f.pdf
].
The Vaccination Education Program believes that in order to ensure a Safer Childhood Vaccination Program it is imperative that the ACT be updated in order to provide free pre-genetic testing to qualify [or disqualify] a child in relation to the administration of mandatory vaccination.

Sign The Petition

Sign with Facebook
OR

If you already have an account please sign in, otherwise register an account for free then sign the petition filling the fields below.
Email and the password will be your account data, you will be able to sign other petitions after logging in.

Privacy in the search engines? You can use a nickname:

Attention, the email address you supply must be valid in order to validate the signature, otherwise it will be deleted.

I confirm registration and I agree to Usage and Limitations of Services

I confirm that I have read the Privacy Policy

I agree to the Personal Data Processing

Shoutbox

Who signed this petition saw these petitions too:

Sign The Petition

Sign with Facebook
OR

If you already have an account please sign in

Comment

I confirm registration and I agree to Usage and Limitations of Services

I confirm that I have read the Privacy Policy

I agree to the Personal Data Processing

Goal
2 / 10000

Latest Signatures

Information

Katherine McCormickBy:
HealthIn:
Petition target:
Government, World health Organisation, Parents and Practitioners.

Petition community:
Utopia Research Institute

Tags

children, health, pre-genetic risks, vaccines

Share

Invite friends from your address book

Embed Codes

direct link

link for html

link for forum without title

link for forum with title

Widgets