Tintagel Mast sign now

People living close to Bossiney Mast at Tintagel should have been given the chance to oppose it before it was erected.

Sign The Petition

Sign with Facebook sign_with_twitter
OR

If you already have an account please sign in, otherwise register an account for free then sign the petition filling the fields below.
Email and the password will be your account data, you will be able to sign other petitions after logging in.

Privacy in the search engines? You can use a nickname:

Attention, the email address you supply must be valid in order to validate the signature, otherwise it will be deleted.

I confirm registration and I agree to Usage and Limitations of Services

I confirm that I have read the Privacy Policy

I agree to the Personal Data Processing

Shoutbox

Who signed this petition saw these petitions too:

Sign The Petition

Sign with Facebook sign_with_twitter
OR

If you already have an account please sign in

Comment

I confirm registration and I agree to Usage and Limitations of Services

I confirm that I have read the Privacy Policy

I agree to the Personal Data Processing

Goal
291 / 1000

Latest Signatures

  • 03 January 2016291. C M
    People living close to the mast should have been given the chance to object before it was erected, I undrestood that was the law !
  • 21 December 2015290. Neil L
    People living close to the mast should have been given the chance to object before it was erected
  • 17 December 2015289. Helen B
    I agree with comment 305 below. 30,000 a year for 30 years, to ruin our AONB.
  • 04 December 2015288. Tommy H
    People living close to the mast should have been given the chance to object before it was erected
  • 10 November 2015287. Vincent D
    ****ADVERTISMENT**** ##GROW YOUR OWN DOPE## . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (Plant a Tintagel Parish Councillor!)
  • 05 November 2015286. Bob I
    I support this petition
  • 02 November 2015285. Bill Y
    Tintagel Parish Councillors are only interested in gaining advantage for themselves over the rest of us, and it is clearly working. For them.
  • 12 October 2015284. Polly A
    We don't need it, we don't want it, and it is there illegally. Everybody affected by the mast should be consulted - not just the few who profit from it.
  • 29 September 2015283. Simon J
    the purpose of this mast is reflective of the council that so want to protect it. when it works it still provides a crap reception for the community!!
  • 28 September 2015282. Robert E
    The Bossiney mast an cabins adjacent to Haun cottage are a clear example of the worst and sloppy planning processes of NCDC. CC has before it a request from a significant number of residents and objectors for the mast's use to be discontinued. I strongly
  • 29 August 2015281. Shane L
    People living close to the mast should have been given the chance to object before it was erected
  • 11 July 2015280. Min D
    I am not from Tintagel and I dont understand how a council can dig up five nerds who dont agree people living close the mast should have been given the chance to object before it was erected.
  • 09 July 2015279. Samantha B
    People living close to the mast should have been given the chance to object before it was erected
  • 22 June 2015278. B V
    Why weren't people living close to the mast given the chance to object before it was erected
  • 31 May 2015277. Paul B
    I agree with comment 305 below.
  • 17 May 2015276. Tracey T
    I support this petition
  • 07 May 2015275. Mechelle H
    Give us a clue, Why? It spoils this beatiful landscape.
  • 02 May 2015274. Chris H
    Tintagel Council is a SELF-HELP GROUP.
  • 26 April 2015273. Roger J
    What would YOU do if you found a mast over 100ft high had been erected almost touching your home with no warning and no planning application?
  • 16 April 2015272. Janet F
    I support this petition
  • 05 April 2015271. K S
    I support this petition
  • 17 March 2015270. Richard F
    I support this petition
  • 13 March 2015269. Lee S
    People living close to the mast should have been given the chance to object before it was erected
  • 11 February 2015268. Colleen H
    What is happening to democracy in Tintagel ??????
  • 11 December 2014267. D H
    We are on holiday in Tintagel and we think the Mast is awful.
  • 20 November 2014266. P R
    People living close to the mast should have been given the chance to object before it was erected, I undrestood that was the law !
  • 17 November 2014265. Jo A
    Local people should have been consulted on the mast before it was erected. In addition to planning legislation, the council may also be subject to the requirements of the 'Duty to Involve' people in its decision-making processes.

browse all the signatures

Information

Luella CochranBy:
TelecommunicationsIn:
Petition target:
Cornwall Council

Tags

No tags

Share

Invite friends from your address book

Embed Codes

direct link

link for html

link for forum without title

link for forum with title

Widgets