Ridge Protectors/US Fish & Wildlife Service sign now


October 12, 2007

Mr. Michael J. Bartlett
United States Department of the Interior
Fish and Wildlife Service
New England Field Office
70 Commercial Street, Suite 30
Concord, NH 03301-5087

Dear Mr. Bartlett,

We represent residents and property owners in Vermont who are very concerned about potential adverse impacts to wetlands, vernal pools, prime bear habitat, birds and bats, and other wildlife, should the proposed UPC Sheffield Wind facility be built. Building seven miles of roads with rights of way 36 -100 feet wide, with fill 18 thick, and blasting for sixteen concrete bases 30 feet deep, on ridge lines above 2000 feet elevation, with wetlands, vernal pools and headwaters that flow both north and south, is unprecedented.

In your January 3, 2007 letter to Mr. Cowan of UPC, you clearly documented areas of concern pertaining to the preconstruction studies conducted by UPC. Expert witness, Professor William Kilpatrick of UVM, also submitted compelling evidence that showed UPCs bird & bat studies were lacking. Despite these criticisms Vermonts Agency of Natural Resources (ANR) supported the UPC project and signed a memorandum of understanding, which we believe was counter to the ANRs own guidelines. The Public Service Board, in turn, accepted UPCs studies as adequate and conditioned that post-construction surveys be done by UPC consultants instead of disinterested third party scientists.

As you know, studies at existing wind facilities located in the east (Mountaineer (WV), Maple Ridge (NY), Meyersdale (PA)), have shown high mortality rates for birds and, especially so, for bats. These studies also suggest even higher mortalities at high elevation ridge lines with wetlands.

Not mentioned in the hearings nor in any developer studies is the fact that ducks, geese, and other water fowl migrate over these ridge lines and stop over in the wetlands in the Sheffield project area. Threatened species of interior forest birds come north to live here for the warmer months. We are very concerned that their habitat and nesting will be severely interrupted. The rotor-swept area of the 316 foot diameter blades is 1.8 acres. The 16 turbines would create a 28.8 acre vertical area linearly aligned along the ridge thus accentuating the opportunity for strikes.

Given the political pressure in Vermont and New England to construct renewable electric generation developments, particularly industrial-scale wind plants, we are concerned that otherwise thoughtful biologists and wildlife experts are being compelled to ignore their best judgment. We encourage you and your colleagues in EPA and the Corps of Engineers to exercise your authorities to the fullest and hope that our state and federal officials will encourage you as well. Existing Vermont laws would normally prohibit this large scale ridge line development. We should not adjust our standards for the sake of renewable energy; all of us have an obligation to ensure that sufficient, scientifically legitimate studies are done before permit decisions are made. We thank you for your attention to this very important matter.


Cc: J. Douglas, Governor
P. Leahy, U.S. Senator
B. Sanders, U.S. Senator
P. Welch, U.S. Representative
J. Austin, VTDF&W
F. Hammond VTDF&W
S. Darling VTDF&W
C Gjessing VTANR
M. Adams, COE, Reg. Div. VT Ofc
A. Hoar, RP/ES
T. Sullivan, NYFO
A. Manville, WO/MB
P. Bosco, FWS/LE
D. Rothstein, Sol. Office, RO

Sign The Petition

Sign with Facebook
OR

If you already have an account please sign in, otherwise register an account for free then sign the petition filling the fields below.
Email and the password will be your account data, you will be able to sign other petitions after logging in.

Privacy in the search engines? You can use a nickname:

Attention, the email address you supply must be valid in order to validate the signature, otherwise it will be deleted.

I confirm registration and I agree to Usage and Limitations of Services

I confirm that I have read the Privacy Policy

I agree to the Personal Data Processing

Shoutbox

Who signed this petition saw these petitions too:

Sign The Petition

Sign with Facebook
OR

If you already have an account please sign in

Comment

I confirm registration and I agree to Usage and Limitations of Services

I confirm that I have read the Privacy Policy

I agree to the Personal Data Processing

Goal reached !
200 / 100

Latest Signatures

  • 27 December 2015200. George Lorrainew
    I support this petition
  • 23 December 2015199. David H
    This project is not in Vermont's best interests and serves no useful energy purpose.
  • 07 December 2015198. Mark D
    I support this petition
  • 19 October 2015197. Robert Pb
    I support this petition
  • 14 September 2015196. Jeanne Md
    I support this petition
  • 13 August 2015195. Chrstopher Tm
    В
  • 25 July 2015194. Denise F
    I support this petition
  • 16 July 2015193. William Heddyj
    I support this petition
  • 30 June 2015192. Hugh K
    I support this petition
  • 01 June 2015191. Richard Fm
    I support this petition
  • 25 May 2015190. Cheryl M
    I support this petition
  • 25 May 2015189. Abigail B
    I support this petition
  • 17 May 2015188. Herb Dig
    I support this petition
  • 13 May 2015187. Trenny R
    protect these ridges and wildlife from this subsidized boondogle
  • 10 April 2015186. Beth Mq
    I support this petition
  • 18 March 2015185. Nancy Pw
    I support this petition
  • 15 March 2015184. Manuel Am
    I AM TOTALLY OPPOSED TO THIS PROJECT
  • 05 March 2015183. Kevin M
    I support this petition
  • 22 February 2015182. Kelley L
    Please think of the future of our state and the value we hold in our ridgelines. Wind turbines are not reliable and even if they are eventually removed the enviroment can never be put back to pre -turbine condition. You will still have the cement and stee
  • 08 February 2015181. Paul Lb
    I support this petition
  • 23 January 2015180. David Ac
    I support this petition
  • 16 January 2015179. Kathleen D
    I support this petition
  • 09 January 2015178. Tracey B
    I support this petition
  • 25 December 2014177. Elizabeth B
    I support this petition
  • 23 December 2014176. Arthur F
    I support this petition
  • 03 December 2014175. Bonnie D
    I support this petition
  • 25 October 2014174. John Gf
    I support this petition

browse all the signatures

Information

Lorna HurstBy:
Politics and GovernmentIn:
Petition target:
US Fish & Wildlife Service

Tags

No tags

Share

Invite friends from your address book

Embed Codes

direct link

link for html

link for forum without title

link for forum with title

Widgets