Letter to the St. Kate's Administration sign now

In light of the recent decision by the College of St. Catherine administration to disallow both Senator Hillary Clinton and conservative pundit Bay Buchanan from speaking on campus, the students of St. Kates feel compelled to offer a response to the situation.

It is our understanding that St. Kates has pursued a path of neutrality during this election year in order to avoid the appearance of partisanship during the volatile weeks preceding the election (as quoted in college President Sr. Andrea Lees recent letter to the Board of Trustees). This neutrality is both disheartening and disturbing.

Firstly, as students participating in a university setting, we are expected to behave as adults in our academic studies, athletic competitions, and extracurricular pursuits. We have proven ourselves worthy of higher education and now stand at the vanguard of academia. How is it, then, that our own administration presumes that we are incapable of handling the volatility of this 2008 election season?

Secondly, the administration of this college has declared their intent to pursue neutrality throughout the election process while encouraging strong and active campus engagement (again, as quoted in Sr. Andrea Lees letter to the Board of Trustees). The students of St. Kates would like to challenge the notion that there is such a thing as neutrality when it comes to the political world. Even if Vice President of Academic Affairs, Colleen Hegranes believes, as she stated in the Star Tribune article, that inviting three speakers of each party would bring neutrality, she would be incorrect. There is simply no such thing as an all-inclusive way to engage students of every political stripe. Many students at St. Kates and elsewhere would challenge the idea that they fall into either of the dominant political parties. Do we then need to invite an equal number of Socialist, Green, and Independent party members to campus as well? And what of the anarchists? It is quite evident that a path of neutrality is, in actuality, more difficult to negotiate than a path of political engagement. And, let there be no mistake about it: political neutrality is not, in any way, political engagement.

Additionally, the line drawn between what is political and what is neutral is a thin, blurred line indeed. For instance, St. Kates prides itself on the diverse artists and speakers we invite to campus each semester. We challenge the concept that art somehow exists outside of politics. Thus, how can we have the James Sewell Ballet or the Ananya Dance Company (both upcoming events at the OShaughnessy on campus) and not invite their politics with their art? When people in authority begin deciding what is neutral and what is political, they are navigating dangerous territory. The Ananya Dance Company, a collective of women of color who use art to express social, political, and economic concerns, is just as political as Senator Clinton or Ms. Buchanan.

Thirdly, the message we are sending to St. Kates studentsthe past, present, and futureis an unfortunate one. It is more than unfortunateit is frankly embarrassing. We are the nations largest college for women. We were founded by the Sisters of St. Joseph of Carondelet, sisters who believed in the education of women at a time when educating women was not the social norm or even an acceptable norm. We pride ourselves, supposedly, on grooming leaders. How then, can we choose political neutrality over active political engagement? We recognize that administrators will challenge this point; however, it is quite clear to the students that political discourse cannot be properly expressed on our campus unless our differences are given the appropriate forums for discussion. How can we foster political engagement in a climate that does not allow either side of the aisle to speak on campus during a critical election year? How can any sort of resolution be arrived at between students of differing political beliefs when there is no encouragement from our administration to do so? Engagement and discourse cannot exist where neutrality is the dominant school of thought. Besides stifling student debate, we are stifling political identities. We are telling young women that it is acceptable to disenfranchise themselves in order to save face in the public eye or the financial realm.

For us, the students of St. Kates, this is unacceptable. We believe that students at a college-level are more than ready to face the political disputes and volatility that accompany an election season. We believe, furthermore, that political neutrality is a figment of our administrations collective imagination. Finally, we believe that our administrations decision to disallow both Ms. Buchanan and Senator Clinton is embarrassing and inappropriate on the grounds that this college was rooted in stronger stuff.

The disconnect between our activist past and our neutral present seems nearly impossible to overcome at this point. However, we implore the community of the College of St. Catherinesoon to become St. Catherine Universityto challenge the administrative norms just as the Sisters did in founding this educational institution.

Sign The Petition

Sign with Facebook
OR

If you already have an account please sign in, otherwise register an account for free then sign the petition filling the fields below.
Email and the password will be your account data, you will be able to sign other petitions after logging in.

Privacy in the search engines? You can use a nickname:

Attention, the email address you supply must be valid in order to validate the signature, otherwise it will be deleted.

I confirm registration and I agree to Usage and Limitations of Services

I confirm that I have read the Privacy Policy

I agree to the Personal Data Processing

Shoutbox

Who signed this petition saw these petitions too:

Sign The Petition

Sign with Facebook
OR

If you already have an account please sign in

Comment

I confirm registration and I agree to Usage and Limitations of Services

I confirm that I have read the Privacy Policy

I agree to the Personal Data Processing

Goal
0 / 100

Latest Signatures

No one has signed this petition yet

Information

Tags

No tags

Share

Invite friends from your address book

Embed Codes

direct link

link for html

link for forum without title

link for forum with title

Widgets