Better Child Custody Laws sign now

Petition for a Child Custody Law that prevents Discrimination of Location Jurisdiction and Petition Opinionating a Family Magistrates Abuse of Discretion and Negligence to consider the facts of the case.


In a child custody case in a County West Virginia a case came before a Family Magistrate with two Fit and Loving parents who lived in different states. Both parents were undecided as to which parent would have custody for a four-year-old girls School year; both parents wanted the child for this time. In the case: the Majority of time spent with one parent, prior involvement with childs activities and education, Information of Public schools child would be attending in either state, Stability of Living arrangements, need for child care, Quality of Households, Income, gender of child, and concerns of parents with the upbringing of the child: were not considered in the Ruling of custodial parent. The Magistrate had conference with the Attorneys and Guardian Ad Litem and gave his ruling to the attorneys who notified parents of this before either parent walked into the courtroom, when both parents did walk into the courtroom it was to hear his ruling.

The Magistrate ruled that the child should reside with Father living in West Virginia not stating ANY REASON whatsoever besides that it would be easier for the Magistrate to preside over the case. The Magistrate stated in quote "It is easier for me to preside over this case if she is spending the majority of time in West Virginia and she is attending West Virginia Schools" Further stating I. will be presiding over this case when she is Seventeen at which is very sketchy to come to this definite conclusion considering Mother resides in Michigan and Father resides in a different county of jurisdiction from the County that the parents were formerly married and has been presiding over the case. He quoted It is easier for me to contact the schools in West Virginia than it is for me to contact the schools in Michigan he also stated I am not saying the Best interests of the child is with the Mother and I am not saying that the Best interests of the Child is with the Father As a matter of fact he did not even state what the Best Interests of the child were AT ALL. Please help me at least receive a fair trial for my daughter, and Possibly for other out of state parents who have been discriminated by location as well.

FACTS IN THE CASE THAT WERE NOT CONSIDERED
Not to go into too much detail about personal life potentially offending both parents and I do not want to present an unbiased view for this petition. I will put it can be proven that this parent has more of this factor. Or this parent has more qualifying factors on the things that are sensitive and hard to prove.

I AM ONLY LISTING THESE FACTORS TO PRESS THE IMPORTANCE OF CREATING A LAW THAT PREVENTS DISCRIMINATION OF LOCATION, JURISDICTION.

It can be proven that Mother has had Daughter Majority of the time even on a 50/50 Joint Custody Schedule.

It can be proven that Mother has had more involvement in Education and in Extra Curricular Activities, providing preschool, ballet, and gymnastics for her four-year old daughter which was extremely hard to do on a 50/50 Joint Custody Schedule.

Mother lives in a different state, and Father lives in a different County.

Father and Spouse do not have medical insurance on themselves or their children, because they do not meet the qualifications for Medicare or Medicaid due to the properties they own and are trying to rent out and insurance is not provided through Fathers spouses work.

Mothers Spouse is the provider of medical, dental and vision insurance for Mothers family and children. However, my daughter no longer qualifies for medical insurance through my husband because Mother has to have child custody of child more than 50\% of the time in court order for my husband to carry her on insurance, so my daughter no longer has medical, dental and vision insurance.

It can be proven that the schools at Mothers Residence, have higher state proficiency scores and more curriculum opportunities than that of the Fathers.

The Mother has more qualifying factors of a stable living arrangement in light of the recent house she and spouse have purchased to remain in the same location of spouses work. The time she has lived in the immediate vicinity of her location in Michigan over two years The Fathers very short period of time in the State of West Virginia 4 months at court hearing and his living situation.

Both Immediate Families of Mother and Father Reside in West Virginia at Fathers Vicinity However, this was not even mentioned in the Magistrates Ruling of Location

Father has daughter enrolled in childcare Five days a week

Mother is an unemployed stay at home mom with hopes of attending college online when disposition permits.

Mothers spouse is a mid-level factory worker for the Nations Largest Manufacturer of Generic Pharmaceutical products

Father is unemployed attending college on campus Four days a week.

Fathers wife is a waitress

Mothers aspirations are to eventually attain a Bachelors in Environmental Management and work with HAZMAT through online courses until her youngest child is school age.

Mothers Spouses aspirations are to attain his Bachelors degree, at which he is working on in business so that he can move up the ladder in the company that he is working for.

Fathers Aspirations are to attain a degree to be a Physical Education Teacher.

Last I heard Fathers spouse did not at that time intend to attain a higher education.

Combined between Mother and Father, Mothers Income for family is considerably higher than that of Fathers.

And of course a hard topic gender significance.

PLEASE SIGN THIS PETITION SO THAT WE CAN POSSIBLY PASS A LAW THAT WILL BETTER OUR CHILD CUSTODY SYSTEM BY PREVENTING JUDICIAL ABUSE OF POWER AND SHOW THE MAGISTRATE COURTS THAT THESE ARE VERY IMPORTANT DECISIONS THAT EFFECT OUR CHILDREN'S LIVES AND THAT THEY SHOULD NOT BE CONSIDERED LIGHTLY.

Sign The Petition

Sign with Facebook
OR

If you already have an account please sign in, otherwise register an account for free then sign the petition filling the fields below.
Email and the password will be your account data, you will be able to sign other petitions after logging in.

Privacy in the search engines? You can use a nickname:

Attention, the email address you supply must be valid in order to validate the signature, otherwise it will be deleted.

I confirm registration and I agree to Usage and Limitations of Services

I confirm that I have read the Privacy Policy

I agree to the Personal Data Processing

Shoutbox

Who signed this petition saw these petitions too:

Sign The Petition

Sign with Facebook
OR

If you already have an account please sign in

Comment

I confirm registration and I agree to Usage and Limitations of Services

I confirm that I have read the Privacy Policy

I agree to the Personal Data Processing

Goal
0 / 50

Latest Signatures

No one has signed this petition yet

Information

Randy SkinnerBy:
ReligionIn:
Petition target:
WV Circuit Court, WV Supreme Court

Tags

No tags

Share

Invite friends from your address book

Embed Codes

direct link

link for html

link for forum without title

link for forum with title

Widgets