Able Danger sign now

This text is from a letter by Congressman Curt Weldon. It was signed by 246 members of the House including 100 Democrats and 145 Republicans.


Dear Secretary Rumsfeld:

We the undersigned are formally requesting that you allow former participants in the intelligence program known as ABLE DANGER to testify in an open hearing before the United States Congress. Until this point, congressional efforts to investigate ABLE DANGER have been obstructed by Department of Defense insistence that certain individuals with knowledge of ABLE DANGER be prevented from freely and frankly testifying in an open hearing. We realize that you do not question Congresss authority to maintain effective oversight of executive branch agencies, including your department. It is our understanding that your objection instead derives from concern that classified information could be improperly exposed in an open hearing. We of course would never support any activity that might compromise sensitive information involving national security. However, we firmly believe that testimony from the appropriate individuals in an open hearing on ABLE DANGER would not only fail to jeopardize national security, but would in fact enhance it over the long term. This is due to our abiding belief that America can only better prepare itself against future attacks if it understands the full scope of its past failures to do so.

On September 21, the Senate Committee on the Judiciary conducted a hearing on ABLE DANGER which Bill Dugan, Acting Assistant to the Secretary of Defense for Intelligence Oversight, certified did not reveal any classified information. Congressman Curt Weldons testimony at that hearing was largely based on the information that has been given to him by ABLE DANGER participants barred from open testimony by DOD. Their testimony would therefore closely mirror that of Congressman Weldon, who did not reveal classified information. Therefore we are at a loss as to how the testimony of ABLE DANGER participants would jeopardize classified information. Much of what they would present has already been revealed. Further refusal to allow ABLE DANGER participants to testify in an open congressional hearing can only lead us to conclude that the Department of Defense is uncomfortable with the prospect of Members of Congress questioning these individuals about the circumstances surrounding ABLE DANGER. This would suggest not a concern for national security, but rather an attempt to prevent potentially embarrassing facts from coming to light. Such a consideration would of course be an unacceptable justification for the refusal of a congressional request.

Sign The Petition

Sign with Facebook
OR

If you already have an account please sign in, otherwise register an account for free then sign the petition filling the fields below.
Email and the password will be your account data, you will be able to sign other petitions after logging in.

Privacy in the search engines? You can use a nickname:

Attention, the email address you supply must be valid in order to validate the signature, otherwise it will be deleted.

I confirm registration and I agree to Usage and Limitations of Services

I confirm that I have read the Privacy Policy

I agree to the Personal Data Processing

Shoutbox

Who signed this petition saw these petitions too:

Sign The Petition

Sign with Facebook
OR

If you already have an account please sign in

Comment

I confirm registration and I agree to Usage and Limitations of Services

I confirm that I have read the Privacy Policy

I agree to the Personal Data Processing

Goal
1000 / 5000

Latest Signatures

  • 01 March 20161000. Philip F
    I support this petition
  • 01 March 2016999. Julie H
    I support this petition
  • 29 February 2016998. Ilya Andrews
    I support this petition
  • 29 February 2016997. Ron M
    I support this petition
  • 28 February 2016996. Eric H
    I support this petition
  • 27 February 2016995. Henry B
    I support this petition
  • 26 February 2016994. Susanne O
    I support this petition
  • 26 February 2016993. Susan K
    I support this petition
  • 26 February 2016992. Karen C
    I support this petition
  • 25 February 2016991. Lou P
    I support this petition
  • 25 February 2016990. Thomas S
    I support this petition
  • 24 February 2016989. Matt D
    I support this petition
  • 23 February 2016988. Betty C
    I support this petition
  • 23 February 2016987. Ty R
    I support this petition
  • 23 February 2016986. Roberta Wentzelwaltermaatrb
    I support this petition
  • 22 February 2016985. Deborah R
    I support this petition
  • 21 February 2016984. Pat H
    I support this petition
  • 21 February 2016983. Jack M
    I support this petition
  • 21 February 2016982. William C
    I support this petition
  • 21 February 2016981. Val S
    I support this petition
  • 21 February 2016980. Nikki A
    I support this petition
  • 21 February 2016979. D S
    I support this petition
  • 20 February 2016978. Josh S
    I support this petition
  • 19 February 2016977. Jim H
    I support this petition
  • 18 February 2016976. Dawn Mh
    I support this petition
  • 18 February 2016975. Mitchelle W
    I support this petition
  • 18 February 2016974. Judith C
    I support this petition

browse all the signatures

Information

Barry CharlesBy:
TelecommunicationsIn:
Petition target:
Secretary of Defense

Tags

No tags

Share

Invite friends from your address book

Embed Codes

direct link

link for html

link for forum without title

link for forum with title

Widgets